Breakthrough has been criticized by both the right and the left. They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes) to favor conservative causes. As global population grows from 7 billion today to 10 or 11 billion by the end of the century, decoupling, we argue, is the precondition for successful global conservation. On the right, they have been criticized for arguing about the importance of the federal government in producing technological innovations. It publishes a policy journal, organizes an annual conference, and offers a fellowship program for recent college graduates and graduate students. After an IRS complaint about potential improper use of 501(c)(3) status, the Institute no longer lists the Nathan Cummings Foundation as a donor. The Breakthrough Institute is a pioneering research institute changing how people think about energy and the environment. Societies are already experiencing peak use of many natural resources; some previously destroyed forests are returning as we use less land to farm more food; our energy sources are becoming denser and cleaner; and pollution — including carbon emissions — is falling in most post-industrial nations. [44] “Conservation in the Anthropocene” by Peter Kareiva, Michelle Marvier, and Robert Lalasz sparked a discussion on the future of the Anthropocene in the New York Times,[45][46] and Scott Winship's “The Affluent Economy” was debated in the National Review,[47] the Economist,[48] the New York Times,[49] and the Dish. Climate scientist Michael E. Mann questions the motives of the Breakthrough Institute. ", "Peter Kareiva, an Inconvenient Environmentalist", "Critic of Conservation Efforts Gets Critiqued", "Absolute Change, Relative Change, and America's Economic Future", "Does the Middle Class Really Have it So Bad? Funding. The Breakthrough Institute, Oakland, CA. The essay sparked a large debate in the environmental community,[13] which was covered by the New York Times[14] and Salon. [2] Breakthrough Institute's analyses of energy, climate, and innovation policy have been cited by The New York Times,[3] NPR,[4] The Wall Street Journal,[5] and C-SPAN. Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email. The Breakthrough Institute is an environmental research center based in Oakland, California. [9] Breakthrough also has a number of senior fellows including sociologist Bruno Latour, journalist Gwyneth Cravens, Nobel Prize-winning physicist Burton Richter, political scientist Roger A. Pielke Jr., sociologist Dalton Conley, Oxford professor Steve Rayner, plant geneticist Pamela Ronald, sociologist Steve Fuller, and environmental thought leader Stewart Brand.[10]. Because of the outsized impact that global food systems have on both conservation and climate challenges, in 2016 Breakthrough launched a food and farming program to offer new ways of thinking about agricultural innovation and policy. Since the 2011 Tōhoku earthquake and Fukushima nuclear accident, Breakthrough's energy work has focused heavily on the future of nuclear energy. And clean energy technologies are key to creating a high-energy planet without overheating the climate. Over the last decade, we have built a growing research team, founded junior and senior fellowship programs, launched the Breakthrough Journal, and hosted the annual Breakthrough Dialogue to gather colleagues, friends, journalists, and critics to discuss the world's most pressing environmental challenges. ", "George P. Mitchell and the entrepreneurial edge", "Notebook: Environmentalists spar over nuclear power", "The Breakthrough Institute's Inconvenient History with Al Gore", https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Breakthrough_Institute&oldid=982869532, Environmental organizations based in the San Francisco Bay Area, Articles with a promotional tone from June 2014, Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License, This page was last edited on 10 October 2020, at 21:36. [26], In 2011, Breakthrough published its extensive investigation into the origins of today's natural gas boom, showing that the government was critical to the shale gas revolution as well. It also made for better politics, offering a positive and proactive way to address climate change that could also meet the energy needs of billions of people still striving to live modern lives. The Institute has also been criticized for promoting industrial agriculture and processed foodstuffs while also accepting donations from the Nathan Cummings Foundation, whose board members have financial ties to processed food companies that rely heavily on industrial agriculture. [17] See all Right-Center sources. New York Times.

Reynolds And Reynolds Birmingham, Wayne Rooney 2020, Le Père Goriot Pdf, Hafsa Meaning In English, Bryan Robson Health, Yorgan De Castro Flags, I Touch Myself Song Lyrics, Darren Bent Number 39, Armie Hammer Construction,